<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sir Ken Robinson &#8211; Do schools kill creativity? (TED Conference 2006)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006</link>
	<description>For Advertising Students and Professionals Worldwide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:03:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Wow, this guy hit the nail on the head.  I used to have a great inagination and creativity as a child and adolessence, but as I got older I watched it fade away.  Dont get me wrong, I can still be creative, but I often have trouble comming up with truly unique and creative ideas anymore.  Now I know why...Im afraid to be WRONG!!  What an epiphiny! Where did I lean this fear?  The public school system!  Thanks.

With that being said, if money was no object, I would shut down the public school system all together and privatize education.  Private schools are not always better, but with my model, they would either sink or swim, just as businesses do.  The good ones would stay in business because they are doing a good job and the bad ones would have poor enrollment and be forced to restructure or close their doors.  The parents of students would receive a voucher to attend ANY school of their choice, and because of this, the schools compete for your business and therefore would constantly be trying to one-up each other with the variety of subjects and programs offered.

The schools would all have an area of specialization that they would be known for.  Some schools would be great for &quot;ADD&quot; kids and would focus and would focus on an intensly hands on interactive way of teaching.

Some schools would have great athletics, great arts programs, writing, and yes even history (some people find it quite interesting, and so it is they that can really learn from it, the rest of us just make it.).  You name it there would be a school that offers it as their strength or specilty.  

Trade schools would begin in the 7th grade, so that they enjoy their education and are able to use it once graduated from HIGH SCHOOL.  

Why we go to school for 14 years (preschool through high school) and have no specialized skills to boot is beyond me.  What is the point?  Surly it does not take 14 years to master the &quot;basics&quot;.  What more is that then if we want to learn a specialized skill, or trade, or area of study, we then have to go back to school on OUR OWN TIME to finally learn something useful.  Again, I just dont get it.  It&#039;s no wonder some kids are totally put off by the idea of continuing their education after high school, they are so burnt out by that time (if they haven&#039;t dropped out already) that the last thing they want to do is do another 4 to 8 years of it, 2 of which are spent on MORE GENERAL ED!  The public school system is a disaster, and the unions who support them are largely to blame.

That is the reason that I am seriously considering HOME SCHOOLING my two children.  My son who is 4 shows the &quot;symptoms&quot; of a child that may be labeled ADD or ADHD.  I watch my brother who got that label early on on school, just barely passing one grade to the next, because he learned differently.  I will not watch that happen to my kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this guy hit the nail on the head.  I used to have a great inagination and creativity as a child and adolessence, but as I got older I watched it fade away.  Dont get me wrong, I can still be creative, but I often have trouble comming up with truly unique and creative ideas anymore.  Now I know why&#8230;Im afraid to be WRONG!!  What an epiphiny! Where did I lean this fear?  The public school system!  Thanks.</p>
<p>With that being said, if money was no object, I would shut down the public school system all together and privatize education.  Private schools are not always better, but with my model, they would either sink or swim, just as businesses do.  The good ones would stay in business because they are doing a good job and the bad ones would have poor enrollment and be forced to restructure or close their doors.  The parents of students would receive a voucher to attend ANY school of their choice, and because of this, the schools compete for your business and therefore would constantly be trying to one-up each other with the variety of subjects and programs offered.</p>
<p>The schools would all have an area of specialization that they would be known for.  Some schools would be great for &#8220;ADD&#8221; kids and would focus and would focus on an intensly hands on interactive way of teaching.</p>
<p>Some schools would have great athletics, great arts programs, writing, and yes even history (some people find it quite interesting, and so it is they that can really learn from it, the rest of us just make it.).  You name it there would be a school that offers it as their strength or specilty.  </p>
<p>Trade schools would begin in the 7th grade, so that they enjoy their education and are able to use it once graduated from HIGH SCHOOL.  </p>
<p>Why we go to school for 14 years (preschool through high school) and have no specialized skills to boot is beyond me.  What is the point?  Surly it does not take 14 years to master the &#8220;basics&#8221;.  What more is that then if we want to learn a specialized skill, or trade, or area of study, we then have to go back to school on OUR OWN TIME to finally learn something useful.  Again, I just dont get it.  It&#8217;s no wonder some kids are totally put off by the idea of continuing their education after high school, they are so burnt out by that time (if they haven&#8217;t dropped out already) that the last thing they want to do is do another 4 to 8 years of it, 2 of which are spent on MORE GENERAL ED!  The public school system is a disaster, and the unions who support them are largely to blame.</p>
<p>That is the reason that I am seriously considering HOME SCHOOLING my two children.  My son who is 4 shows the &#8220;symptoms&#8221; of a child that may be labeled ADD or ADHD.  I watch my brother who got that label early on on school, just barely passing one grade to the next, because he learned differently.  I will not watch that happen to my kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Pulver</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Pulver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-47</guid>
		<description>First of all, Mr. Robinson&#039;s speach was extremely entertaining and very well spoken. He does a great job at grasping attention and interest in his words. This speech really hit home with me because I completely feel that my creativity has slowly deminished as I&#039;ve travelled through the education system; my mind has been closed, not opened as it should be, and just rescently I&#039;ve been finding that creative spark again. Why is this? As Mr. Robinson said- education predominantly focuses on math and literacy, which I find funny because I can&#039;t begin to tell you how many college students I know who are horrible at math and hate writing essays. 
So what to do about this problem? First of all, there should be required curicullum of the arts throughout all levels of education. I know there are some required fields; however, there should be just as much time spent in the day on the artistc subjects as there are on math/english/history, etc. Many academic professionals would think this to be crazy, but why? In today&#039;s society there are just as many succesful artistic jobs as there are corporate. People only get sucked into the corporate world because it&#039;s what they&#039;re taught to believe is the right path; yet, most of those people are completely miserable. 
Secondly, there should be multiple mandatory field trips throughout each year of each grade to artistic type places, such as, playhouses, musicals, museums, concerts, etc. Many children are never given the oportunity to experience these types of events until they are older, when theyre creativity has already been deminished. If exposed to these at an early age and shown the impiortance, many more children&#039;s creative horizons would be broadened. 
Lastly, I belive the teachers need to carry much more responsibility in heling the children discover their talents within. Teachers of young children spend more time with the kids than parents do; they observe the way they learn, their talents and downfalls, and what really holds their interest. Therefore, the teachers should not discourage artistic talents, rather they should work to fully bring out these talents in the children. On each report card there should be a section where the teacher writes what they believe is the child&#039;s strongest point, whether it be math or drawing, and encouragement should be given to the parents to further nurture and light a fire under these talents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Mr. Robinson&#8217;s speach was extremely entertaining and very well spoken. He does a great job at grasping attention and interest in his words. This speech really hit home with me because I completely feel that my creativity has slowly deminished as I&#8217;ve travelled through the education system; my mind has been closed, not opened as it should be, and just rescently I&#8217;ve been finding that creative spark again. Why is this? As Mr. Robinson said- education predominantly focuses on math and literacy, which I find funny because I can&#8217;t begin to tell you how many college students I know who are horrible at math and hate writing essays.<br />
So what to do about this problem? First of all, there should be required curicullum of the arts throughout all levels of education. I know there are some required fields; however, there should be just as much time spent in the day on the artistc subjects as there are on math/english/history, etc. Many academic professionals would think this to be crazy, but why? In today&#8217;s society there are just as many succesful artistic jobs as there are corporate. People only get sucked into the corporate world because it&#8217;s what they&#8217;re taught to believe is the right path; yet, most of those people are completely miserable.<br />
Secondly, there should be multiple mandatory field trips throughout each year of each grade to artistic type places, such as, playhouses, musicals, museums, concerts, etc. Many children are never given the oportunity to experience these types of events until they are older, when theyre creativity has already been deminished. If exposed to these at an early age and shown the impiortance, many more children&#8217;s creative horizons would be broadened.<br />
Lastly, I belive the teachers need to carry much more responsibility in heling the children discover their talents within. Teachers of young children spend more time with the kids than parents do; they observe the way they learn, their talents and downfalls, and what really holds their interest. Therefore, the teachers should not discourage artistic talents, rather they should work to fully bring out these talents in the children. On each report card there should be a section where the teacher writes what they believe is the child&#8217;s strongest point, whether it be math or drawing, and encouragement should be given to the parents to further nurture and light a fire under these talents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony C.</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Sir Ken Robinson is a passionate speaker with an extraordinary view of creativity. He brings up some interesting aspects of the education system and I for one find myself fascinated by his views on leaving imagination free from control. 

The first thing I would change is to develop a class system based on communication styles. Then when the students feel comfortable relating there thoughts, ideas and opinions with people similar to themselves, then branch the classes out to mix the different communication styles. As far as I know there are 4 types I learned about so 2 and 2 could interact at a time then switch it up.

The second thing would be to include the concept of an Idea Journal starting in classrooms as early as kindergarten. This way teachers are able to visually depict the creativity that is sparked within each child. Enhancing the mind at an early stage is vital in order to bring out talents that may lay hidden. We wouldn&#039;t want to deprive a student of possibly stumbling upon something great, that potentially might change the world we live in today.

The third thing falls along the line of creativity at every corner. This means a tentative schedule every school day so that if something inspires a student at any time of the day while instruction, he or she are able to act upon it. This could be in the form of drawing, acting, singing, dancing, or even playing. No boundaries or limitations. Rules are in place but limited in ties to creativity. Let an idea be carried on and not forgotten because the mind is feeble and able to disregard information at any time. 

Who knows what the capabilities of students are? Let&#039;s not under-mind human imagination. For things in this world would not be possible today if someone hadn&#039;t thought up the idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir Ken Robinson is a passionate speaker with an extraordinary view of creativity. He brings up some interesting aspects of the education system and I for one find myself fascinated by his views on leaving imagination free from control. </p>
<p>The first thing I would change is to develop a class system based on communication styles. Then when the students feel comfortable relating there thoughts, ideas and opinions with people similar to themselves, then branch the classes out to mix the different communication styles. As far as I know there are 4 types I learned about so 2 and 2 could interact at a time then switch it up.</p>
<p>The second thing would be to include the concept of an Idea Journal starting in classrooms as early as kindergarten. This way teachers are able to visually depict the creativity that is sparked within each child. Enhancing the mind at an early stage is vital in order to bring out talents that may lay hidden. We wouldn&#8217;t want to deprive a student of possibly stumbling upon something great, that potentially might change the world we live in today.</p>
<p>The third thing falls along the line of creativity at every corner. This means a tentative schedule every school day so that if something inspires a student at any time of the day while instruction, he or she are able to act upon it. This could be in the form of drawing, acting, singing, dancing, or even playing. No boundaries or limitations. Rules are in place but limited in ties to creativity. Let an idea be carried on and not forgotten because the mind is feeble and able to disregard information at any time. </p>
<p>Who knows what the capabilities of students are? Let&#8217;s not under-mind human imagination. For things in this world would not be possible today if someone hadn&#8217;t thought up the idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stella M.</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Watching this speech was very entertaining.  However, it brought up a lot of questions and thoughts regarding our education system.   Looking back at my own experience in the public school system, classes that had to do with creativity such as art or dance were considered electives.  If someone took a lot of these classes they were automatically criticized and looked at as if they weren&#039;t going to college.  This was so frustrating because i really enjoyed these types of classes.  However, because of this idea that has been in bedded in our minds most of my electives were science and AP language classes.  
     In order to have success in the future of education we must look at the creativity of children.  It is such a sad truth that a degree that takes time and effort to accomplish is becoming worthless.  ANd that eventually one must have a PHD in order to get a job within an industry.  In order to change this around we must begin by changing the current public education system.
     To do this there must be a shift in emphasis in classes.  There should be allotted time for arts, crafts or dance that goes along with math and science.  This way you are teaching children the &quot;important&quot; subjects and allowing them to be creative as well.  This can happen by allowing children to create their own solutions in an artistic song, poem, or by drawings.  As long as creativity is being introduced in these classes then you are getting the best of both worlds.
    Education must also nurture those who are solely interested in dance or creative arts.  The stigma that  I had growing up in high school about these classes must be eliminated.   This can be done by requiring students to take 2 years of such type of classes.  This way, because it is a requirement, people won&#039;t look down upon it.  Another way this can be done is by educating students in jobs that involve such creative thinking.  This way, one won&#039;t feel that they must get a degree in Mathematics or science in order to succeed in life.   
     Finally we must nurture creative ideas throughout all 12 years of school for a child.  We tend to see hangings of art and creative designs only in elementary school.  Once Jr. High begins the shift turns to correctly written papers and less color.  The environment in classes has to be fun, full of color and of creativity that the students make.  This should be required in every class every year, regardless the subject.  That way creativity is being nurtured in every subject type, and students won&#039;t feel that they are going to the same dull place to only be taught things.  By allowing students to also show their own talents and be involved in the learning process, this will encourage creativity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching this speech was very entertaining.  However, it brought up a lot of questions and thoughts regarding our education system.   Looking back at my own experience in the public school system, classes that had to do with creativity such as art or dance were considered electives.  If someone took a lot of these classes they were automatically criticized and looked at as if they weren&#8217;t going to college.  This was so frustrating because i really enjoyed these types of classes.  However, because of this idea that has been in bedded in our minds most of my electives were science and AP language classes.<br />
     In order to have success in the future of education we must look at the creativity of children.  It is such a sad truth that a degree that takes time and effort to accomplish is becoming worthless.  ANd that eventually one must have a PHD in order to get a job within an industry.  In order to change this around we must begin by changing the current public education system.<br />
     To do this there must be a shift in emphasis in classes.  There should be allotted time for arts, crafts or dance that goes along with math and science.  This way you are teaching children the &#8220;important&#8221; subjects and allowing them to be creative as well.  This can happen by allowing children to create their own solutions in an artistic song, poem, or by drawings.  As long as creativity is being introduced in these classes then you are getting the best of both worlds.<br />
    Education must also nurture those who are solely interested in dance or creative arts.  The stigma that  I had growing up in high school about these classes must be eliminated.   This can be done by requiring students to take 2 years of such type of classes.  This way, because it is a requirement, people won&#8217;t look down upon it.  Another way this can be done is by educating students in jobs that involve such creative thinking.  This way, one won&#8217;t feel that they must get a degree in Mathematics or science in order to succeed in life.<br />
     Finally we must nurture creative ideas throughout all 12 years of school for a child.  We tend to see hangings of art and creative designs only in elementary school.  Once Jr. High begins the shift turns to correctly written papers and less color.  The environment in classes has to be fun, full of color and of creativity that the students make.  This should be required in every class every year, regardless the subject.  That way creativity is being nurtured in every subject type, and students won&#8217;t feel that they are going to the same dull place to only be taught things.  By allowing students to also show their own talents and be involved in the learning process, this will encourage creativity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogom C.</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogom C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Three things I would change about our educational system are..
-	standardized testing &amp; their weight 
-	the lack of nurturing creative abilities
-	 more hands on events and projects in regards to the core subjects as well as the creative classes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three things I would change about our educational system are..<br />
-	standardized testing &amp; their weight<br />
-	the lack of nurturing creative abilities<br />
-	 more hands on events and projects in regards to the core subjects as well as the creative classes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Sager</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Sager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-43</guid>
		<description>If I could change 3 things in the school systems to promote the use of creativity without repercussions or limitations I would myself have no limitations to what can be done.
1) I remember when I was back in elementary school and all my teachers would always tell my parents that I had ADD and that I should be placed on Ritalin to calm me down and help me stay focused in school. I would be sitting in history class and out of a 45 minute class I would have 1 page of notes and about 3 pages full of doodles. When I was in music class or art then that was a different story, I wasn&#039;t being held back from any thoughts or ideas I would have in my head. Classes like that don&#039;t become mandatory, but history classes become mandatory every year of school all the way through college and you learn about the same shit. ITS CALLED HISTORY...MEANING IT NEVER CHANGED!!!! Learn it once and you know it. Now music and art, those two change yearly, daily, hourly and even every minute its changing. Topics like those die without creativity. Kat Williams say it then best in one of his stand up shows about his son. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze5UVLtgj4s


2) Starting in elementary school all the way through high school imagine before each certain class the teacher would do a 10 minute assignment with the students where they would have to either draw, write, sing, dance, read... anything about whatever topic the class is about. So if it was a science class the students would have 10 minutes to come up with some creative ideas about any field of science and then present it the class by any means they feel like. From personal experience I find myself to be more creative on my toes without much preparation and by doing this exercise starting from a young age it would accomplish 2 things. First it would spark a different fire in the child&#039;s brain to make them think on their toes and be able to come up with creative and effective ideas on the fly. Second, how many time have you heard in school someone, or maybe yourself say, &quot;oh I have stage fright, or that your scared to talk to a group of people.&quot; Thats probably because back in elementary school you were never used to the idea of talking to a group of people. By allowing children to create and present daily or weekly in the class rooms would encourage and make the students more comfortable not just in the class room, but for the rest of their life by making them more comfortable to speak to a group people. 

3) A small and simple way to help ignite creativity with students in elemetry school is on the first day of class have the room completely cleared of desks, cubbies and have everything off the walls. Have different colors of paint and other materials in the room and allow the students to each design a certain part of the class room, whether be painting a picture on the wall, painting the walls certain colors, maybe even instead of the traditional layout of the students facing the front of the room and the teacher standing in front, position the desks in a circle and have the teach stand in the middle... Let the students design their environment. Small things go a long way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could change 3 things in the school systems to promote the use of creativity without repercussions or limitations I would myself have no limitations to what can be done.<br />
1) I remember when I was back in elementary school and all my teachers would always tell my parents that I had ADD and that I should be placed on Ritalin to calm me down and help me stay focused in school. I would be sitting in history class and out of a 45 minute class I would have 1 page of notes and about 3 pages full of doodles. When I was in music class or art then that was a different story, I wasn&#8217;t being held back from any thoughts or ideas I would have in my head. Classes like that don&#8217;t become mandatory, but history classes become mandatory every year of school all the way through college and you learn about the same shit. ITS CALLED HISTORY&#8230;MEANING IT NEVER CHANGED!!!! Learn it once and you know it. Now music and art, those two change yearly, daily, hourly and even every minute its changing. Topics like those die without creativity. Kat Williams say it then best in one of his stand up shows about his son. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze5UVLtgj4s" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze5UVLtgj4s</a></p>
<p>2) Starting in elementary school all the way through high school imagine before each certain class the teacher would do a 10 minute assignment with the students where they would have to either draw, write, sing, dance, read&#8230; anything about whatever topic the class is about. So if it was a science class the students would have 10 minutes to come up with some creative ideas about any field of science and then present it the class by any means they feel like. From personal experience I find myself to be more creative on my toes without much preparation and by doing this exercise starting from a young age it would accomplish 2 things. First it would spark a different fire in the child&#8217;s brain to make them think on their toes and be able to come up with creative and effective ideas on the fly. Second, how many time have you heard in school someone, or maybe yourself say, &#8220;oh I have stage fright, or that your scared to talk to a group of people.&#8221; Thats probably because back in elementary school you were never used to the idea of talking to a group of people. By allowing children to create and present daily or weekly in the class rooms would encourage and make the students more comfortable not just in the class room, but for the rest of their life by making them more comfortable to speak to a group people. </p>
<p>3) A small and simple way to help ignite creativity with students in elemetry school is on the first day of class have the room completely cleared of desks, cubbies and have everything off the walls. Have different colors of paint and other materials in the room and allow the students to each design a certain part of the class room, whether be painting a picture on the wall, painting the walls certain colors, maybe even instead of the traditional layout of the students facing the front of the room and the teacher standing in front, position the desks in a circle and have the teach stand in the middle&#8230; Let the students design their environment. Small things go a long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam E.</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-42</guid>
		<description>If i could change three things about our education system to help promote creativity i would start with the elementary school education system. 

The first thing is a course that would be a class to determine the fields of interest for the kids. See what sparks there minds. Some children would be interested in arts, while others would be interested in science. The purpose of this course would be to discover what the children find interesting and then i would put them on a path to explore that field. With out hindering the kids with specific rules and guidelines on on the subject, i would let there creativity lead them. 

The second thing would be the removal of exams. Exams mainly cause stress to the students. Tests cause students to overwork themselves and focus on what they would need for the exam. This kills creativity. I believe that the professors should just grade them based on how well they are doing and this would promote creativity.

The last thing that i would change would be the funding. If schools can afford to help people educate themselves and provide the necessary materials, then more people can explore there creativity. They can become educated and this would in turn help bring about new changes in our lives. For example, lets say the next great scientist who would change the way we think about life could not afford to go to school. This would not only be a loss to himself but to mankind. We would lose out on the new perspective that he would have created if he did not have finantial difficulties that held him back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i could change three things about our education system to help promote creativity i would start with the elementary school education system. </p>
<p>The first thing is a course that would be a class to determine the fields of interest for the kids. See what sparks there minds. Some children would be interested in arts, while others would be interested in science. The purpose of this course would be to discover what the children find interesting and then i would put them on a path to explore that field. With out hindering the kids with specific rules and guidelines on on the subject, i would let there creativity lead them. </p>
<p>The second thing would be the removal of exams. Exams mainly cause stress to the students. Tests cause students to overwork themselves and focus on what they would need for the exam. This kills creativity. I believe that the professors should just grade them based on how well they are doing and this would promote creativity.</p>
<p>The last thing that i would change would be the funding. If schools can afford to help people educate themselves and provide the necessary materials, then more people can explore there creativity. They can become educated and this would in turn help bring about new changes in our lives. For example, lets say the next great scientist who would change the way we think about life could not afford to go to school. This would not only be a loss to himself but to mankind. We would lose out on the new perspective that he would have created if he did not have finantial difficulties that held him back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kali F</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Kali F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I first watched a video on Sir Ken Robinson on youtube during the 5 Convention. I fully understood what he was saying and I also agreed. In this video, he makes great points as well. There are many things I think should change in the public school system. 
               One idea would be changing around the school schedule. When i was young they called it &quot;block scheduling.&quot; Every other day you would have a different set of classes. Monday, Wednesday, Friday your certain classes. Then tuesday and thursday, another set. Then it would switch each week to make it even. Creating something like this in schools but keeping certain days your math and sciences, and then another set your arts, music, sports, dance, etc. Doing this I feel would make the students look forward to going to school and learning. They are constantly stimulating their brain and learning and CREATING. Their passion is found in all of this. They get better grades. They behave better in school. It is about creating the proper learning environment and what is required by law in public schools, but it is also enlisting creativity. It is always so sad to me to hear of failing music and art departments in public schools, not having the funds to continue. By making a block schedule, or revision of the way classes are planned out each school year, this would be a great change. 
               If I had a choice, a change I would make is testing. I dont believe in tests. I dont believe tests determine how smart you are, what kind of school you can and cant get into. To me, it simply isn&#039;t fair. Instead of submitting test for every subject, I think they should change it to creative projects. Let the student earn their grade through their knowledge and creativity. After students take tests, they immediately forget everything they know, nor do they really care about it afterwards. in doing something different like this, not only does the student really get to put time and effort and CREATIVITY, they are truly earning their grade and building confidence and pride. They grow. I am a strong believer in this. I have always been a horrible test taker, and because of the rules and laws of the school system, I never felt smart enough because my grades were based on a number. Changing the grade system and test taking in this way not only changes their perception of school, it also changes the way they view themselves.
             Lastly, something else I would change would be the teachers themselves. Your children are learning from them. I would choose teachers with the same mindset on creativity. I would make it  requirement for them to follow creative minds like Sir Ken Robinson. The teachers themselves would have to be creative beings and believe enough to teach their students the same way and allowing them to be creative spirits. More traditional teaching needs to be thrown out the door. Old ways need to be updated or taken out all together. We need more teachers with open minds, willing to teach through art, dance, crafts, cooking, playing, etc etc. 
            All in all, these three things are just a start to what needs to be done. Children need to be stimulated. They need the freedom to express themselves and have someone care and listen to them. The arts and music programs need to be more heavily emphasized. Though this, they grow, they gain confidence, they aren&#039;t scared to express themselves, and they have no boundaries. This is how ideas are born.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first watched a video on Sir Ken Robinson on youtube during the 5 Convention. I fully understood what he was saying and I also agreed. In this video, he makes great points as well. There are many things I think should change in the public school system.<br />
               One idea would be changing around the school schedule. When i was young they called it &#8220;block scheduling.&#8221; Every other day you would have a different set of classes. Monday, Wednesday, Friday your certain classes. Then tuesday and thursday, another set. Then it would switch each week to make it even. Creating something like this in schools but keeping certain days your math and sciences, and then another set your arts, music, sports, dance, etc. Doing this I feel would make the students look forward to going to school and learning. They are constantly stimulating their brain and learning and CREATING. Their passion is found in all of this. They get better grades. They behave better in school. It is about creating the proper learning environment and what is required by law in public schools, but it is also enlisting creativity. It is always so sad to me to hear of failing music and art departments in public schools, not having the funds to continue. By making a block schedule, or revision of the way classes are planned out each school year, this would be a great change.<br />
               If I had a choice, a change I would make is testing. I dont believe in tests. I dont believe tests determine how smart you are, what kind of school you can and cant get into. To me, it simply isn&#8217;t fair. Instead of submitting test for every subject, I think they should change it to creative projects. Let the student earn their grade through their knowledge and creativity. After students take tests, they immediately forget everything they know, nor do they really care about it afterwards. in doing something different like this, not only does the student really get to put time and effort and CREATIVITY, they are truly earning their grade and building confidence and pride. They grow. I am a strong believer in this. I have always been a horrible test taker, and because of the rules and laws of the school system, I never felt smart enough because my grades were based on a number. Changing the grade system and test taking in this way not only changes their perception of school, it also changes the way they view themselves.<br />
             Lastly, something else I would change would be the teachers themselves. Your children are learning from them. I would choose teachers with the same mindset on creativity. I would make it  requirement for them to follow creative minds like Sir Ken Robinson. The teachers themselves would have to be creative beings and believe enough to teach their students the same way and allowing them to be creative spirits. More traditional teaching needs to be thrown out the door. Old ways need to be updated or taken out all together. We need more teachers with open minds, willing to teach through art, dance, crafts, cooking, playing, etc etc.<br />
            All in all, these three things are just a start to what needs to be done. Children need to be stimulated. They need the freedom to express themselves and have someone care and listen to them. The arts and music programs need to be more heavily emphasized. Though this, they grow, they gain confidence, they aren&#8217;t scared to express themselves, and they have no boundaries. This is how ideas are born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay M</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-40</guid>
		<description>If there were no limitation in education I would foresee the world as a whole different place.  First, I would make sure that arts would be on the same line of importance in school as math, history, English, and science.  I have found that through my education I have flourished more in the classes I have chosen myself to take.  While arts should be of the same importance the student would be able to choose from an array of classes to fulfill the art requirement no matter what age.   

Second, I would make it mandatory that every teacher encourage their students to pursue their dreams.  Like Sir Ken Robinson said today a degree does not mean the same as it used to.  Students are not encouraged to pursue what they want in life so many choose, like me, to get a degree no matter what it is.  If students are continually encouraged as we grow, it is more likely students will try harder to pursue the career they desire. 

Third, I would implement that all schools grade K-12 would set aside one day every two weeks to allow all students to be creative.  Whether it is draw all day long or write in a journal all day long, they do something they want to do and is creative.  This will allow students to escape from the everyday routine of the normal school schedule and do something they want to do.  Areas or classrooms can be designated for those who feel like cooking, drawing, acting, writing, debating, singing, etc. I feel this will allow students to explore their creative side more than they already can in the school setting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there were no limitation in education I would foresee the world as a whole different place.  First, I would make sure that arts would be on the same line of importance in school as math, history, English, and science.  I have found that through my education I have flourished more in the classes I have chosen myself to take.  While arts should be of the same importance the student would be able to choose from an array of classes to fulfill the art requirement no matter what age.   </p>
<p>Second, I would make it mandatory that every teacher encourage their students to pursue their dreams.  Like Sir Ken Robinson said today a degree does not mean the same as it used to.  Students are not encouraged to pursue what they want in life so many choose, like me, to get a degree no matter what it is.  If students are continually encouraged as we grow, it is more likely students will try harder to pursue the career they desire. </p>
<p>Third, I would implement that all schools grade K-12 would set aside one day every two weeks to allow all students to be creative.  Whether it is draw all day long or write in a journal all day long, they do something they want to do and is creative.  This will allow students to escape from the everyday routine of the normal school schedule and do something they want to do.  Areas or classrooms can be designated for those who feel like cooking, drawing, acting, writing, debating, singing, etc. I feel this will allow students to explore their creative side more than they already can in the school setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young H.</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Young H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed watching Sir Ken Robinson speech his use of examples during the video opened my eyes and made me laugh about the on going problem and it’s impacted on our limitation we face when dealing with our education system.

 During high school, we were to read a newspaper for 15 minutes everyday. The newspapers we read in most cases had the sports and comic sections taken out of them. Like most high school teens many students would just act or briefly go through the newspaper and a waited the 15 min buzzer to go off. I felt this exercise contained no educational value and the time spent during silent reading. Students may have been able to use there time wisely and benefited from it. I always thought to myself why can’t we just draw, write, or read material we were interested in. Thus, my first suggestions in helping our education nurture creativity.  Instead of having students read a newspaper students would be allowed to use the 15 minutes during school to do anything they desired as long it is creative, and productive. Students may read, do home work, draw, paint, and listen to music as long as it is education and creative. Student would keep a journal of what they had accomplished and learned during the 15 minutes of creative time. Student would then turn in the journal at the end of the year and then evaluate what they had year over the course of the school year. I feel if students that are allowed to do something creative and productive they will be able to open there minds more and think outside the box. 

My second suggestion on how I would change our education system to enable us to nurture creativity would be to add a creative course in student’s standard education requirement such as English, Mathematics, Science, and History.  A creativity course will engage in projects and assignments that allow students to use there creative thought process. A student’s grade will not be determined by the A-F standard grading system. As other students mentioned a use a pass or fail system would be more effective and will be solely based on the participation of a student not quality of there work.   

For my third suggestion, I would like to see grade schools offering and encouraging there students to part take in creative events, which will be similar to college week only with providing potential students information on design, culinary, music, and art schools. By making  a few changes to education system, and how they deal with nurturing creativity could go a very long way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed watching Sir Ken Robinson speech his use of examples during the video opened my eyes and made me laugh about the on going problem and it’s impacted on our limitation we face when dealing with our education system.</p>
<p> During high school, we were to read a newspaper for 15 minutes everyday. The newspapers we read in most cases had the sports and comic sections taken out of them. Like most high school teens many students would just act or briefly go through the newspaper and a waited the 15 min buzzer to go off. I felt this exercise contained no educational value and the time spent during silent reading. Students may have been able to use there time wisely and benefited from it. I always thought to myself why can’t we just draw, write, or read material we were interested in. Thus, my first suggestions in helping our education nurture creativity.  Instead of having students read a newspaper students would be allowed to use the 15 minutes during school to do anything they desired as long it is creative, and productive. Students may read, do home work, draw, paint, and listen to music as long as it is education and creative. Student would keep a journal of what they had accomplished and learned during the 15 minutes of creative time. Student would then turn in the journal at the end of the year and then evaluate what they had year over the course of the school year. I feel if students that are allowed to do something creative and productive they will be able to open there minds more and think outside the box. </p>
<p>My second suggestion on how I would change our education system to enable us to nurture creativity would be to add a creative course in student’s standard education requirement such as English, Mathematics, Science, and History.  A creativity course will engage in projects and assignments that allow students to use there creative thought process. A student’s grade will not be determined by the A-F standard grading system. As other students mentioned a use a pass or fail system would be more effective and will be solely based on the participation of a student not quality of there work.   </p>
<p>For my third suggestion, I would like to see grade schools offering and encouraging there students to part take in creative events, which will be similar to college week only with providing potential students information on design, culinary, music, and art schools. By making  a few changes to education system, and how they deal with nurturing creativity could go a very long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlyn D.</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlyn D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-38</guid>
		<description>The first, most obvious, thing I would change about the public education system is to balance the arts with everything else. I do not think that art should be offered as an option to kids, for those who cannot succeed in the other academic departments. I think that an integration of arts with everything else is very important. I remember when I was in elementary we would do art projects that go along with what we learning in history. I think projects like these were very good, but I also think that art was not taught separately enough. I think part of the problem with this is that teachers do not have creative confidence in themselves so they feel intimidated to teach it. I remember always having a guest teacher come teach art, or one teacher that only taught art to all the classes. This gives students the idea that only certain kind of people do art only.

I also think the way art is taught to kids should be changed. From what I remember being taught art in school, it was the only thing that it was okay to be bad at. We were always told its okay if you can&#039;t draw good as long as you try. I&#039;m not saying we should be totally critical on little kids and tell them they are wrong. But I think that basic skills should be taught to them, and each unique student&#039;s skill should be noted and improvement should be encouraged. Teachers should use that technique &quot;oh I really like how you did this it looks really nice, why don&#039;t you try to do this&quot;  If kids are actually encouraged to work on their skills, they wouldn&#039;t see it as a subject that is unimportant and more kids would realize the rewarding feeling of being challenged and creating something unique that they worked hard at. 

Another problem with the public school system is more of a social problem. In regards to kids being afraid to answer questions in class. I think this is because of kids wanting to fit in and not wanting to be wrong because they would look stupid to their classmates. This is not only the teachers fault its just sadly the way lots of schools are. I think that teachers should just do their best to create the best nurturing environment for kids to put all these other things aside. This is not an easy task, but offering extra credit for participation or calling on the quieter students could help getting everyone to share their ideas. Most teachers preach about class participation in the first day of class, but few follow through for the rest of the class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first, most obvious, thing I would change about the public education system is to balance the arts with everything else. I do not think that art should be offered as an option to kids, for those who cannot succeed in the other academic departments. I think that an integration of arts with everything else is very important. I remember when I was in elementary we would do art projects that go along with what we learning in history. I think projects like these were very good, but I also think that art was not taught separately enough. I think part of the problem with this is that teachers do not have creative confidence in themselves so they feel intimidated to teach it. I remember always having a guest teacher come teach art, or one teacher that only taught art to all the classes. This gives students the idea that only certain kind of people do art only.</p>
<p>I also think the way art is taught to kids should be changed. From what I remember being taught art in school, it was the only thing that it was okay to be bad at. We were always told its okay if you can&#8217;t draw good as long as you try. I&#8217;m not saying we should be totally critical on little kids and tell them they are wrong. But I think that basic skills should be taught to them, and each unique student&#8217;s skill should be noted and improvement should be encouraged. Teachers should use that technique &#8220;oh I really like how you did this it looks really nice, why don&#8217;t you try to do this&#8221;  If kids are actually encouraged to work on their skills, they wouldn&#8217;t see it as a subject that is unimportant and more kids would realize the rewarding feeling of being challenged and creating something unique that they worked hard at. </p>
<p>Another problem with the public school system is more of a social problem. In regards to kids being afraid to answer questions in class. I think this is because of kids wanting to fit in and not wanting to be wrong because they would look stupid to their classmates. This is not only the teachers fault its just sadly the way lots of schools are. I think that teachers should just do their best to create the best nurturing environment for kids to put all these other things aside. This is not an easy task, but offering extra credit for participation or calling on the quieter students could help getting everyone to share their ideas. Most teachers preach about class participation in the first day of class, but few follow through for the rest of the class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz L.</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-37</guid>
		<description>to enhance creativity in our education systems, i would definitly give more value to visual and performing arts classes. the core requirements of math, sience, history and english are very important and fundamental in education but, not everyone takes interest in such subjects. when a child doesnt succeed in these areas, often they feel as though they have failed. by implimenting importance on visual and performing arts, children would be able to nurture their talents, abilities and creativity alongside what the regular school curriculum requires. 

secondly, for any given visual art class given, i think there should be no grading scale based on the content of what is produced but instead it should solely be based on participation. whether a student gets an A of F, they are being graded on what the instructor considers to be art. this may limit creativity and therefore cause the student to feel as though there is a structured or way to &quot;create&quot;. something i don&#039;t believe to be true. 

and finally in order to incorporate more creativity, i  would change the structure of a classroom setting. teachers shouldnt limit teaching classes in a white, four wall room with all the seats facing the same way. students would be able to expand their creativity more if they are given more hands on expirences indoor and outdoor as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to enhance creativity in our education systems, i would definitly give more value to visual and performing arts classes. the core requirements of math, sience, history and english are very important and fundamental in education but, not everyone takes interest in such subjects. when a child doesnt succeed in these areas, often they feel as though they have failed. by implimenting importance on visual and performing arts, children would be able to nurture their talents, abilities and creativity alongside what the regular school curriculum requires. </p>
<p>secondly, for any given visual art class given, i think there should be no grading scale based on the content of what is produced but instead it should solely be based on participation. whether a student gets an A of F, they are being graded on what the instructor considers to be art. this may limit creativity and therefore cause the student to feel as though there is a structured or way to &#8220;create&#8221;. something i don&#8217;t believe to be true. </p>
<p>and finally in order to incorporate more creativity, i  would change the structure of a classroom setting. teachers shouldnt limit teaching classes in a white, four wall room with all the seats facing the same way. students would be able to expand their creativity more if they are given more hands on expirences indoor and outdoor as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayley Honeycutt</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayley Honeycutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-36</guid>
		<description>If there were no limits whatsoever on education (monetary, political, etc.) there would be many more than three things I would change about the educational system. First of all, after school activities and programs would be extremely expansive. It is a proven fact that the highest percentage of juvenile crime happens between the hours of 3 and 4 pm- after school. After school programs not only nurture a child&#039;s education and creativity, but also increase their self worth and esteem. If teachers, librarians, coaches, and other mentors take time to be that guiding light for the youth, there would be less crime, less gang membership- but more importantly, kids would feel like life was worth fighting for, education was something that would be extremely desired, and even if their home life was not the best situation, these kids would feel loved- they would know that they mattered. And I believe that it is never too late to begin these programs. But for best results, the educational system has to start young. Kindergarten to the fifth grade are the most vital years for a child. because everything that shapes them in these years, they will take with them for the rest of their lives. And it can&#039;t just be in the schools- parents also need to understand the importance of their children. Have them help fold the laundry or stir the batter in the kitchen. I wish parents wouldn&#039;t let their children watch more than an hour of television or video games a day (no television and video games would be ideal) because it is not the responsibility of the TV networks nor video games to raise your children. If you want them to be good people you, the parent have to instill that in them. Education can&#039;t just end when the school day does; it has to go home with them too. that&#039;s why I believe that sitting down with your family for at least one meal a day can dramatically alter a child&#039;s life. Having family game nights instead of sitting round the television- because let&#039;s face it- even though you&#039;re all in the same room doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re together. And some may include the need for religious institution here, but I feel that you don&#039;t have to go to church to be a good person. Religious education is actually one that I am against- I believe religion can limit creativity and self-expression. I would never force my children to go to church or Sunday school because children should be able to make their own decisions about life without worrying about eternal damnation. Thirdly, I don&#039;t think education should be limited to an institution or building. I believe that creativity can&#039;t come from white walled buildings. I think it would be great if classes could occur outdoors. I also believe that field trips are also important- getting influences from outside the classroom to help peak creativity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there were no limits whatsoever on education (monetary, political, etc.) there would be many more than three things I would change about the educational system. First of all, after school activities and programs would be extremely expansive. It is a proven fact that the highest percentage of juvenile crime happens between the hours of 3 and 4 pm- after school. After school programs not only nurture a child&#8217;s education and creativity, but also increase their self worth and esteem. If teachers, librarians, coaches, and other mentors take time to be that guiding light for the youth, there would be less crime, less gang membership- but more importantly, kids would feel like life was worth fighting for, education was something that would be extremely desired, and even if their home life was not the best situation, these kids would feel loved- they would know that they mattered. And I believe that it is never too late to begin these programs. But for best results, the educational system has to start young. Kindergarten to the fifth grade are the most vital years for a child. because everything that shapes them in these years, they will take with them for the rest of their lives. And it can&#8217;t just be in the schools- parents also need to understand the importance of their children. Have them help fold the laundry or stir the batter in the kitchen. I wish parents wouldn&#8217;t let their children watch more than an hour of television or video games a day (no television and video games would be ideal) because it is not the responsibility of the TV networks nor video games to raise your children. If you want them to be good people you, the parent have to instill that in them. Education can&#8217;t just end when the school day does; it has to go home with them too. that&#8217;s why I believe that sitting down with your family for at least one meal a day can dramatically alter a child&#8217;s life. Having family game nights instead of sitting round the television- because let&#8217;s face it- even though you&#8217;re all in the same room doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re together. And some may include the need for religious institution here, but I feel that you don&#8217;t have to go to church to be a good person. Religious education is actually one that I am against- I believe religion can limit creativity and self-expression. I would never force my children to go to church or Sunday school because children should be able to make their own decisions about life without worrying about eternal damnation. Thirdly, I don&#8217;t think education should be limited to an institution or building. I believe that creativity can&#8217;t come from white walled buildings. I think it would be great if classes could occur outdoors. I also believe that field trips are also important- getting influences from outside the classroom to help peak creativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kayla M</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Kayla M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I attended elementary school in San Diego at a school called Alcott Elementary school. This school was unique in that it was a school with a purpose; meaning each grade had a specific focus on a certain cultural and artistic aspect in our world that we explored within the city of San Diego. After listening to Robinson&#039;s speech, I was immediately taken back to these experiences that I had when I was yonger. The activities we did and the actions we took in learning about our specific purpose, were so unconventional and unlike any other learning experience I have had, up until college at least. That being said, I would first change that about the education system in elementary, middle, and high schools. If teachers and administrators were to be more open to unconventional methods of teaching such as this, I think it would produce more thoughtful and productive students. 

Secondly, I would implement more of the arts in elementary, middle and high schools. There are so many requirements that students must accomplish that are geared toward mathmatics for example, but none for foreign language and music/ arts. Robinson talked briefly about the arts and their importance and I agree. I never took any sort of art or music class in high school (except maybe the one intro to art that was required at my high school; but it was structured in a typical classroom format leaving little room for interpretation or pure creativity). Basically, I think students should still learn the basics as in a traditional sense, but also that the public school systems should structurally mirror the college system of learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended elementary school in San Diego at a school called Alcott Elementary school. This school was unique in that it was a school with a purpose; meaning each grade had a specific focus on a certain cultural and artistic aspect in our world that we explored within the city of San Diego. After listening to Robinson&#8217;s speech, I was immediately taken back to these experiences that I had when I was yonger. The activities we did and the actions we took in learning about our specific purpose, were so unconventional and unlike any other learning experience I have had, up until college at least. That being said, I would first change that about the education system in elementary, middle, and high schools. If teachers and administrators were to be more open to unconventional methods of teaching such as this, I think it would produce more thoughtful and productive students. </p>
<p>Secondly, I would implement more of the arts in elementary, middle and high schools. There are so many requirements that students must accomplish that are geared toward mathmatics for example, but none for foreign language and music/ arts. Robinson talked briefly about the arts and their importance and I agree. I never took any sort of art or music class in high school (except maybe the one intro to art that was required at my high school; but it was structured in a typical classroom format leaving little room for interpretation or pure creativity). Basically, I think students should still learn the basics as in a traditional sense, but also that the public school systems should structurally mirror the college system of learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bianca D</title>
		<link>http://www.theadclass.com/education/sir-ken-robinson-do-schools-kill-creativity-ted-conference-2006/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Bianca D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theadclass.com/?p=161#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed this video as well.  After viewing this and the past couple days of this course in creativity is where I realized how almost deprived we&#039;ve been for most of our education career when it comes to creativity.  We were taught at a very young age in school that there is only a right or wrong answer.  For the most part all the course in middle school and elementary were about structure and anything that involved creativity was left for extra curricular.  Even in the first years of schooling all the doodling and art projects were left to the &quot;babies&quot; and some where along line there were no more projects that allowed us to show our creative talents. I believe that if we had the opportunity to take most courses that allowed us use our creative abilities we would be able to apply it to our other subjects by allowing us to have a more opened mind.  I&#039;ve I could change some of the things about our education system I would definitely eliminate standardize testing, one its a waste of money and two its further enforces the idea that there is only a wrong or right answer. And the obvious, ENCOURAGE more creativity in the class room and keeping it consistent through out our educational careers.  I believe one of the main reasons we&#039;ve made hard for students to think on there own and out of the box is because somewhere down the line anything that was reality to art, music, extra curricular was considered of very little importance.  Therefore discouraging us to peruse our creativity in those areas because it wasn&#039;t going to get us where we wanted because of the standards our educational system requires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this video as well.  After viewing this and the past couple days of this course in creativity is where I realized how almost deprived we&#8217;ve been for most of our education career when it comes to creativity.  We were taught at a very young age in school that there is only a right or wrong answer.  For the most part all the course in middle school and elementary were about structure and anything that involved creativity was left for extra curricular.  Even in the first years of schooling all the doodling and art projects were left to the &#8220;babies&#8221; and some where along line there were no more projects that allowed us to show our creative talents. I believe that if we had the opportunity to take most courses that allowed us use our creative abilities we would be able to apply it to our other subjects by allowing us to have a more opened mind.  I&#8217;ve I could change some of the things about our education system I would definitely eliminate standardize testing, one its a waste of money and two its further enforces the idea that there is only a wrong or right answer. And the obvious, ENCOURAGE more creativity in the class room and keeping it consistent through out our educational careers.  I believe one of the main reasons we&#8217;ve made hard for students to think on there own and out of the box is because somewhere down the line anything that was reality to art, music, extra curricular was considered of very little importance.  Therefore discouraging us to peruse our creativity in those areas because it wasn&#8217;t going to get us where we wanted because of the standards our educational system requires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

